Source 1
- My first source I believe that my first source, which is a news article I found on the library database, is a good candidate for a primary source.
- I chose it because it seemed like a credible source, and it pertained to what I am doing my research over. It directly address my topic in that it is about how GM had to empty all their emergency funds.
- As stated above, the source is about how GM had to empty all their funds to stay in business.
- I noticed that this particular source was all logos, straight facts
Source 2
- This source I got out of the money section of the Wall Street Journal. That in it self should be enough for it to qualify as a good primary source
- I chose it once again because it pertained to my topic but it also had a lot of good information about the current auto crises.
- This source is about how GM and other US auto makers are going to cut costs to try and bail themselves out of the current predicament they are in.
- For being a business/money article I noticed more emotion and pathos in this article. Since there were a lot of quotes I think those are what added the more personal approach to the article.
Source 3
- My third source is more personal stories and articles from the General Motors website. These are very primary because they are coming straight from the people being affected by this auto crises.
- I chose this because I think it adds a good perspective on just how important this crises is. These are actual people and companies being affected.
- The source is in general about General Motors and their financial status and how that is affecting other people who work closely with GM.
- There is a lot of pathos associated with this website because some of these people who write these articles could possibly be out of work and whenever peoples lively hood are being threatened to be taken away people get very emotional.